Not to mention that in terms of recording, 24 bit or higher gives you a lot of extra headroom, so you can record at lower gain and minimize recording artifacts and clipping etc without incurring a noise penalty. For example, if you do a lot of work with plugin synths, aliasing artifacts can be reduced in some cases using higher sample rates and if you record a lot of acoustic instruments, you can sometimes notice a slight difference, especially in reverb tails and such recording at a higher sampling rate. Marketing / correctional bias is a huge thing and if you can't get a mix to sound good in which ever DAW you use, *unless there is a serious bug in the audio engine* then it's down on your mixing skills, rather than the DAW.įor example, it says that (in a very small test) listeners could not tell the difference between a file recorded for cd format 16 bit 44.1 vs a 24 bit 192 Khz file, this is often variable dependent on program material. I have used FL Studio and it's audio quality is fine.Īlthough the link provided is a bit debatable in some areas, it is mostly fine too. I suppose if I was convinced it was inferior I might consider switching to a different DAW. So I guess the only question is about the sound engine quality, is there any proof that it is inferior? How can this be tested? I would really like to find this out because all I really hear is 'oh, yeah my friend who works audio here says it's bad,' - well wheres the proof in that!? But apart from that if you use 3rd party plugins as 99% of people do anyway, and if you're writing electronic music with VSTi I guess there's not that much to complain about. So you could imagine 'growing up' with this DAW I copped a lot of crap from the pros saying it's a terrible program and the sound engine quality is shit etc and I should switch to Cubase or Logic to make it sound better, but I stuck with it and I'm glad I did because as my production techniques evolved so did FL, and today it is now a very complete and professional DAW and I don't feel so embarrassed about using it!Ī few things I will admit about FL Studio, the native plugins suck and to record say a band or something similar though it would be a tad clumsy. So I guess you could say It must be a good enough program to be accepted for commercial use, so why does it cop so much shit about being a 'noob' program? I have released many tracks for commercial sale with it and toured as well. So I've used FL Studio since I first began producing about 7 years ago and still use it to this day.
0 kommentar(er)
